Posts: 16,012
Threads: 1,685
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation:
0
BIRD33 Wrote:Then Rodman should get in before Dumars.He's got 5 or 6.You know rings dont matter.Why is it your argument always boil down to I rooted for them when I was a kiddie?You're a homer.
I read a book called "who's better who's best" about bball and the sixers all time great ranks were 1. Chamberlin,2. Dr. J,3. Moses, 4. Barkley and 5. AI.
Do you really think Dumars would have belonged on that list?Please.
I said this team.
I agree, Rodman should be in before Dumars.
Dumars will get in for his collective efforts in the front office and on the court.
I'll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours
Posts: 16,012
Threads: 1,685
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation:
0
BIRD33 Wrote:So rodman should make it before barkley?No.I agree dumars should make it as a player but before Barkley is laughable.
Barkley, who was selected one of the NBA's 50 greatest players in 1996, averaged 22.1 points and 11.7 rebounds per game across a 16-year career.
Pretty stellar. No rings sucks.
I'll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours
Posts: 16,012
Threads: 1,685
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation:
0
BIRD33 Wrote:Since thats the extent of your Barkley knowledge Im not suprised you dont know what your talking about.Rings mean shit.Chamberlin is recognized as the best center ever even though his main rival(russel) had 8 more than him.
Barkley
Dream team(No joe D or Isiah)
1 MVP of the league(add up Isiah's,Rodmans and Dumars totals and its still not equal to chucks)
Compare barkleys rebound totals to Rodmans(the best rebounder of all time).
Thats all Im doing you've either got to be joking or a kool-aid drinking homer.
stop
I'll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours
Posts: 32,452
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Keep the talking out your ass to a minimum, thanks.
See You In Toledo
Posts: 13,679
Threads: 549
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Let's not talk about all-time team top 5...that's only going to end well for me.
Posts: 16,012
Threads: 1,685
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation:
0
Andy Katz
Sorry, but unless Memphis does something spectacular, I'm seeing the four No. 1 seeds as Connecticut, Duke, Villanova and Texas. A subjective quotient has to be in there somewhere, and those are the four best teams in this non-committee member's mind. How they land on the seed line is still to be determined and affects the No. 2s and so on, but even if 'Nova loses to UConn next week, I'd still go with the Wildcats over the Tigers for the final No. 1 spot. I'm giving some love to the Pac-10, with Cal deserving some mention as a top-16 seed (as in a No. 4, perhaps) with UCLA. Iowa soars into the top 10 as the top team in the Big Ten. The senior leadership of the Hawkeyes is starting to make a huge difference in this league. And Kansas keeps on cruising, making the Jayhawks a possible No. 3 or 4 seed once the brackets are all done.
1. Connecticut/Duke/Villanova/Texas
5. Memphis
6. Gonzaga
7. Tennessee
8. Iowa
9. Florida
10. Kansas
11. West Virginia
12. Cal
13. UCLA
14. N.C. State
15. Boston College
16. Pittsburgh
I'll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours
Posts: 28,652
Threads: 4,420
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
0
Wasn't those the 4 teams I said would win the title?
Posts: 16,012
Threads: 1,685
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation:
0
Anhil8tor Wrote:Wasn't those the 4 teams I said would win the title?
yeah, you're some kind of sports expert :roll:
I'll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours