[CT280]

I find it incredibly odd that he would confess to something he did, if he didn't do it. And I tend to think an admission of guilt is really a steadfast way of determining if someone is guilty. But, no, there is no evidence that he did it. Why do we need eveidence if he confessed he did it, is what I wonder?

my point exactly. my guess is he had no choice but to admit it since he left the trail of stupidity behind that kind of left no doubt. i could give a fuck about admin logs, or if they were even checked. the fact that he owned up to doing it is all the proof i need.