04-24-2006, 03:19 PM
Jason Cole of the Miami Herald confirms many of the details first reported on Sunday by Charles Robinson of Yahoo! Sports regarding Reggie Bush and the apparently free teepee in which his family was residing during the 2005 season.
New tidbits from Cole include a revelation that Bush has hired lawyer David Cornwell to handle the matter. Cornwell has basically stonewalled Cole's efforts to get answers regarding the situation.
Cole also addresses the primary question regarding this situation: What does it all mean to Bush, and to USC?
Citing NCAA bylaw 12.3.1 and an NCAA rules guide for student-athletes, Cole suggests that Bush might have been ineligible for the entire 2005 season.
The controlling language, based on our own review of the NCAA bylaws, seems to come from Rule 12.3.1.2(b):
12.3.1.2 Benefits from Prospective Agents. An individual shall be ineligible per Bylaw 12.3.1 if he or she (or his or her relatives or friends) accepts transportation or other benefits from:
(a) Any person who represents any individual in the marketing of his or her athletics ability. The receipt of such expenses constitutes compensation based on athletics skill and is an extra benefit not available to the student body in general; or
(b) An agent, even if the agent has indicated that he or she has no interest in representing the student-athlete in the marketing of his or her athletics ability or reputation and does not represent individuals in the student-athlete's sport.
As Dante suggested in the April 23 PFT PodCast, Bush likely will be screwed on this one if his family did not pay a fair rental price during their stay in the house owned by Michael Michaels, an aspiring sports marketing agent. Cole indicates that, even if market value was tendered to Michaels, there still could be problems for Reggie due to the fact that the NCAA frowns on relationships between athletes and agents.
The consequences of a violation are still unclear. If this situation had come to light during the season, Bush automatically would have been ruled ineligible -- and USC would have been required to petition for his reinstatement. Even if Bush's family had paid over to Michaels the full value of the benefits received (if any), Bush might have missed a game, or more.
Now that the season has been finished, what happens? It's a question that we and others will be considering very carefully over the coming days and weeks.
Meanwhile, Vince Young might want to start working on a belated Heisman pose.
New tidbits from Cole include a revelation that Bush has hired lawyer David Cornwell to handle the matter. Cornwell has basically stonewalled Cole's efforts to get answers regarding the situation.
Cole also addresses the primary question regarding this situation: What does it all mean to Bush, and to USC?
Citing NCAA bylaw 12.3.1 and an NCAA rules guide for student-athletes, Cole suggests that Bush might have been ineligible for the entire 2005 season.
The controlling language, based on our own review of the NCAA bylaws, seems to come from Rule 12.3.1.2(b):
12.3.1.2 Benefits from Prospective Agents. An individual shall be ineligible per Bylaw 12.3.1 if he or she (or his or her relatives or friends) accepts transportation or other benefits from:
(a) Any person who represents any individual in the marketing of his or her athletics ability. The receipt of such expenses constitutes compensation based on athletics skill and is an extra benefit not available to the student body in general; or
(b) An agent, even if the agent has indicated that he or she has no interest in representing the student-athlete in the marketing of his or her athletics ability or reputation and does not represent individuals in the student-athlete's sport.
As Dante suggested in the April 23 PFT PodCast, Bush likely will be screwed on this one if his family did not pay a fair rental price during their stay in the house owned by Michael Michaels, an aspiring sports marketing agent. Cole indicates that, even if market value was tendered to Michaels, there still could be problems for Reggie due to the fact that the NCAA frowns on relationships between athletes and agents.
The consequences of a violation are still unclear. If this situation had come to light during the season, Bush automatically would have been ruled ineligible -- and USC would have been required to petition for his reinstatement. Even if Bush's family had paid over to Michaels the full value of the benefits received (if any), Bush might have missed a game, or more.
Now that the season has been finished, what happens? It's a question that we and others will be considering very carefully over the coming days and weeks.
Meanwhile, Vince Young might want to start working on a belated Heisman pose.

