09-14-2007, 06:58 PM
quint Wrote:And what would your stance be if this wasn't the Pats? Instead of seeing what team a player or coach is on, how about judging the action? . Bonds (cheater) has been an idiot since his earlt days in Pittsburgh. Looks like Bill and Tom are could be known as the the Rosa Ruiz of the NFL.That wasn't what I was trying to say. Obviously if a team cheats, they cheat, regardless of where they're from. What is it that you want me to do now? Denounce the team altogether? Become a Jets fan? Congratulate Philly on their Super Bowl win a few years ago? That's ridiculous.
People who knowingly cheat suck regardless of what town they play in.
The Pats have to win the Bowl this year. If they don't this team becomes an *.
The situation is what it is. They cheated, they got caught, they got penalized. As a Patriots fan, I'm ashamed. I think the is awful. No matter what really happened, or however long they've been taping, people are going to toss asterisks around. Some people will actually believe they only won because they cheated. Some people will whine because it gives their team an "out" for losing. Some people will just pile on and make dumb jokes ('sup Tribal?) because that's the thing to do.
The Pats got bagged for spying illegally, while the majority of other teams in the league simply spy legally. My honest opinion (and why would I lie to you e-folk? :roll
is that the competitive advantage gained from spying illegally vs. spying legally isn't that great. I think it was brash and I think it was arrogant. In terms of an actual difference on the football field, affecting games, I don't really know. Some experts say it's not a big deal, others think it is.I think the main reason for the "hefty" fine is that Belichick deliberately disobeyed an edict set forth by Goodell. Goodell said "don't did it" and Belichick did it anyway, and in week 1 no less. The punishment was more for that than it was for actually affecting football games, imo.

