05-09-2009, 08:16 AM
what's the general feeling?
Banana Wrote:I've already said that who is my fave motivational poster
Try not to irritate Bird he is Vagina Sensitive
Banana Wrote:I've already said that who is my fave motivational poster
Banana Wrote:I've already said that who is my fave motivational poster
BIRD33 Wrote:The everybody else was doing it defense didnt work with your parents and it doesnt work here.If you want to say the whole decade is tainted then fine but you can't just look the other way because everyone was doing it and pretend like that team is now not tainted.I'm not just picking on the Red Sox, take a look at the 2002 Giants that won the pennant.Close to 8 or 9 guys on that roster were using.it cost manny $8m, probably still just a small step above being a drop in the bucket though.
Part of the reason I think the sox are tainted is because its become pretty obvious David Ortiz was using.
I'd be fine with second chances if this was 2001 to 2005.Everybody knows steroids is cheating now so there is no gray area anymore and if you get caught you are willingly defrauding the game and its fans.I 100% guarantee that if Manny got thrown out for life steroid use would drop 95%.50 games out costs manny what, a few 100K?Didnt he sign a 40 million dollar contract?If I'm a minor leaguer taking the risk is still worth it.
WoolyGoat Wrote:it's just as easy that Ortiz's decline is because he WASN'T on steroids?
his career high in homers (54) came when he was 31 years old in 2006, at a reasonable age which is also well after the new "stricter" testing rules were put in place. then he dipped to 35 and then 23, now he's 34 years old and has zero homers in the middle of may.
guys like bonds and clemens maintained and even improved as they reached their mid to upper thirties, but ortiz is falling off the face of the earth...kind of right around the time where his age should start to affect his production.
it just sucks that the way MLB and the players union have been handling the situation has caused a shadow to be cast over every single player in the game...fans have no way of knowing who they should be proud of and who they should shun, and clean players (if ortiz isn't clean, there's someone else with a similar career arc who IS clean) really have no way to escape the shadow.
and I know you'll tell me I'm drinking kool-aid again, but all I'm trying to say is that it's hard to know what to think about anyone.
WoolyGoat Wrote:it's just as easy that Ortiz's decline is because he WASN'T on steroids?
his career high in homers (54) came when he was 31 years old in 2006, at a reasonable age which is also well after the new "stricter" testing rules were put in place. then he dipped to 35 and then 23, now he's 34 years old and has zero homers in the middle of may.
guys like bonds and clemens maintained and even improved as they reached their mid to upper thirties, but ortiz is falling off the face of the earth...kind of right around the time where his age should start to affect his production.
it just sucks that the way MLB and the players union have been handling the situation has caused a shadow to be cast over every single player in the game...fans have no way of knowing who they should be proud of and who they should shun, and clean players (if ortiz isn't clean, there's someone else with a similar career arc who IS clean) really have no way to escape the shadow.
and I know you'll tell me I'm drinking kool-aid again, but all I'm trying to say is that it's hard to know what to think about anyone.
BIRD33 Wrote:How does your opinion of Big Papi change now that he's been basically proven a liar after saying he was "shocked" manny was juicing?I think he's looking pretty lame.he's a good person, but obviously a fraud as a baseball player. obviously i'll be interested to hear more details as they emerge, but I have to lump him in with Manny and every other guy who's been exposed.